Very interesting point of view... But if identity doesn't matter and being able to experience does, some things can't be experienced without cognitive capabilities either. What can a human infant experience that an adult pig can't? And if there is nothing here, why do we care about human infant being murdered (maybe even more than a human adult being murdered) but not about a poor pig being killed in a slaughterhouse?
i don't know what an infant or fetus can experience
9:10 PM
which is why i am very careful about making a call on that
Alejandro
Very interesting point of view... But if identity doesn't matter and being able to experience does, some things can't be experienced without cognitive capabilities either. What can a human infant experience that an adult pig can't? And if there is nothing here, why do we care about human infant being murdered (maybe even more than a human adult being murdered) but not about a poor pig being killed in a slaughterhouse?
anyway, i dont think we can reach any type of consistent moral argument about any of this unless we completely destroy morality as we know it which i dont think is desirable
Also, even if a fetus or infant have some consciousness... I don't believe it matters more than a pig's consciousness just because they are human. I believe that in the end our experiences, interactions, memories, feelings etc. matter even more than cognitive capabilities.
Also, even if a fetus or infant have some consciousness... I don't believe it matters more than a pig's consciousness just because they are human. I believe that in the end our experiences, interactions, memories, feelings etc. matter even more than cognitive capabilities.
Yup, looking for moral consistency is like looking for orange blue.
Alejandro
Also, even if a fetus or infant have some consciousness... I don't believe it matters more than a pig's consciousness just because they are human. I believe that in the end our experiences, interactions, memories, feelings etc. matter even more than cognitive capabilities.
but i hope you get its not a evil thing. i dont hate tulpas or think that they should be slaves of the host or whatever, we just totally disagree on what matters in this regard
Hm, looking back I said "Headmates are essentially thought patterns, if they 'leave' that just means their thought pattern isn't being used" when explaining that it's okay to reject walk-ins. Then I asked what they think a headmate is...
Although I do consider headmates people and would use pronouns that apply to people, I will question what someone means when they say a headmate is a "person." Sometimes the word can be used to imply there's a whole human being contained within the head of another human being with a whole separate life they are living even when outside the awareness of front. That kind of mindset can also make tulpa creation very difficult, as one might sit and wait and wait for a response that never comes because they expect it to be outside their own mental functioning
Aya
Usually I'm the one people are jumping at for being too cold and "dehumanizing" about tulpas so today was a bit jarring
Welcome to the tulpa moderate club!
People have both criticized me for dehumanizing tulpas and for being delusional because I think tulpas are people(edited)
5:21 PM
Honestly reading this conversation feels... weird.
Your views on tulpamancy will always be scrutinized. If you refer to tulpas as "it", you will be judged. If you refer to tulpas as they/them, you will be judged. I get the sense there are people hoping to resolve judgement because they're not satisfied with "agree to disagree". However, I think it's important to understand that people will make assumptions about you even if that's not what you're going for. It happens to me all the time- any time I bring up a model people say I overcomplicate things. Not everyone likes my ideas and they judge me as someone who can't teach right because I don't do it their way. It's okay to disagree and for people to not understand your approach. I think these conversations are important, but when it's more about trying to justify your position, everyone gets tired of it
I don’t think that only one of „it” or „they” approach is correct, those are not exclusive terms and you can consider both of them in different contexts and both have their place.
I personally don’t judge anyone if I disagree with their views or methods, I just think some things can be impractical, not healthy or disruptive. I’m a fan of keeping things simpler, but if something works for someone then who am I to judge. What I see in everyone’s tulpamancy practice is that in tulpamancy it’s the expactations that drive your experience, so in my opinion any method will work given enough time really. It’s just that simplicity and quick results is what I believe will benefit tulpamancers. Those might not be priorities for other people.(edited)
well i have something that can help people get rid of their fear of parroting
5:15 PM
Our mindset is firstly that it doesn't really matter in the end who is generating the responses because they are generated by the mind, and if associated with a thoughtform will belong to it
Secondly, that it doesn't matter if you are parroting because it is still the thoughtform
essentially, like when you remote control a dream character, you may be controlling it but it is still the dream character doing the action (is atleast a good way to look at it)
5:17 PM
and that lastly, thoughtforms have a degree of autonomy to begin with. iirc, pretty much anything imagined can be considered a thoughtform. if you imagine a house for example, you are probably not piecing together every little detail consciously, it is more of something generated. and similarly, even if you parrot your tulpa, at some point it will become automatically generated to save the effort
I don't have any suggestions, it's really solid.
I do feel that it's like a more clean version of other advice I have seen. I don't know if it's 100% original but it's definitely laying out ideas a lot of people have all in a neat explanation
i mean, it is probably out there somewhere. but we didn't pull anything from guides, maybe from conversations subconsciously. we dont read guides anymore, we lose interest far to quickly
also i would never use "clean" to describe our explanations for anything. our main problem with explaining is overthinking, and it causes it to be clunky and seem half assed even though a lot of effort goes into it
For helping me make my tulpa? No, not really.
For helping me understand the concept of a tulpa in the first place (basically kick-starting this whole journey)? Hell yeah.
5:35 PM
I feel like tulpa creation is something you have to figure out for yourself
and that was the point of the advice, because demystifying the tulpa to give you a better understanding is the first step in effectively making a tulpa